The official race policy of the Nazis considered Germans to be Aryans* declaring themselves as ‘THE’ superior race, and accordingly all other races were thus inferior with special emphasis placed on the inferiority of Jews!
Before Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Nazis had already begun building and filling concentration camps with Jews and others they deemed as “undesirables.” They soon realized that they had violated the age-old proverb of putting ‘the cart-before-the-horse’ when they hadn’t first defined or answered the question of “What is a Jew?”
Therefore, it was decided to organize an official committee to create what they called “The Nuremberg Race Laws.” The purpose of this was to codify their ideas about race as the necessary first step toward fulfilling Hitler’s vision of annihilating European Jewy.
In James Q. Whitman’s seminal work ‘Hitler’s American Model’, he writes,
“In the late 1920’s and early 1930’s many Nazis, including not least Hitler himself, took a serious interest in the racist legislation of the United States. Indeed in Mein Kampf Hitler praised America as nothing less than “the one state” that had made progress toward the creation of a healthy racist order of the kind the Nuremberg Laws were intended to establish.”2*
Although Hitler commended America for its progress toward a racial state that the Nazis desired to create for themselves; they were yet unaware of any detailed precedents for such a state; and therefore assumed there were none. However, because they had already begun the action of rounding up Jews, they needed to find an immediate philosophical legal basis as their first step toward their ‘Final Solution.’
However, after their initial research began, the Nazi scholars brought together to create “The Nuremberg Race Laws” quickly uncovered the existence of precedents they so desperately desired.
On June 5, 1934, Roland Freisler, who was the secretary of the Nazi Ministry of Justice released their initial findings:
“This jurisprudence would suit us perfectly, with a singly
exception. Over there they have in mind, practically speaking,
only coloreds and half-coloreds, which includes mestizos
and mulattoes; but the Jews, who are also of interest to us, are
not reckoned among the coloreds”3*
To what perfect “jurisprudence” was Freisler referring? Incredibly, he referenced the laws of slavery in the American South! In other words, and I repeat, the Nuremberg Committee assembled to determine the definition of a Jew to ultimately establish a racial German state began their official research by studying the slave laws of the American South!!!
In his book ‘Death of a Nation’, author Dinesh D’Souza references Whitman’s work ‘Hitler’s American Model’ confirming Freisler’s opinion:
“Whitman’s documentation is thorough. He even has the records
of the Nuremberg meetings, showing how the Nazis basically
took the Democratic laws, crossed out the word “black”, wrote
in the word “Jew” and had their work largely done for them.”4*
On the very next page of ‘Death of a Nation’, D’Souza continues,
“Whitman a progressive (a euphemism for liberal) legal scholar, is
also reluctant to assign blame where it is due. He talks about
“American white supremacy,” “American racism”, “American law”,
and “American influence on the Nuremberg Laws. Surely he
knows that the Democratic laws were bitterly contested under
the nation’s two-party system. Yes, there were anti-
miscegenation laws in a couple of Republican states, but
America, in general, didn’t do this...the Democrats did. Yet as
the very title of Whitman’s book suggests, he resorts to the
familiar tactic of blaming America---not the Democratic party--
for inspiring Nazi policies.”5*
Furthermore, I find it ironic, but not shocking, that Dr Eddie Glaude, a distinguished ‘Black’ ‘professor of African American Studies’ at the prestigious Princeton University, and author of ‘Democracy in Black’ endorses Whitman’s book. He glowingly writes, “This is a critical book for our difficult times. Whitman forces us to see America through Nazi eyes and to realize how profoundly white supremacy has shaped this country. Chilling in its details, the unsettling insights of ‘Hitler’s American Model’ jump from every page. A must read!”
Of course, through his words,
1.“Whitman forces us to see America through Nazi eyes”;
2. “to realize how profoundly white supremacy has shaped this
… Dr Glaude follows Whitman’s path by applying his shocking discovery to America rather than the Democrat party, who created every slave law the Nazis considered!!!!
Allow me to make this perfectly clear! Who created the slave laws of the South which the Nazis used as templates? While the liberal Whitman and his contemporary Democrat acolytes like to answer with a resounding “White Racism!!!” Whiteness!!!” “White Supremacy!!!” “White People!!! These are simply half-truths! Tragically, and F.Y.I.--a half-truth + a half-truth= a whole lie!! In reality, and I emphatically repeat, the Nazis used Democrat laws created in the antebellum South as their models to create a racial state resulting in the slaughter of 6 million Jews!!
In short, and in review, contrary to James Whitman (and Dr Eddie Glaude), it was not ‘American law’ that served as ‘Hitler’s American Model’, inspiring the Nuremberg Laws to define a Jew; neither was it ‘White people’ who created the racist laws enslaving Black people in the American South, but ‘Democrat White people!!!
*Interestingly, Hitler never defined Ayran!!
2*James Q. Whitman, ‘Hitler’s American Model’, Princeton University Press, 2017, pg 2
3*Ibid, pg 1
4*Dinesh D’Souza, Death of a Nation, St Martin’s Press, 2018, pg147.
"Even if you're on the right track, you’ll still get run over if you stand still." -Will Rogers
This Thomas Nast political cartoon originates from the October, 3,1868 edition of Harper’s Weekly*. The time period is just after the start of Re-construction (1866-1876). Let’s examine this image to better understand Nast’s critical portrayal of the Democrat mindset regarding Black people. The cartoon uses the Biblical story of Samson and Delilah to tell the story of the attack on Black Suffrage (voting rights) in the South.
1.First, the image is a visual of how Southern Democrats removed the voting rights of Black people. If you look closely, Delilah uses a razor called “the lost cause regained.” The “cause” refers to “Southern Redemption”*, which is the name Democrats created in order to restore Whites to power and Blacks back into subjugation. As I previously outlined in Tidbit #3 of this series, Democrats created 11 ways to prohibit Blacks from the legal right of voting. This was done after and in spite of the unanimous passage of the 15th Amendment by Republicans that gave the legal right for Blacks to vote.
2.Second, like in the biblical account, the White Delilah tricks the Black Samson, and is shown holding his hair in her hand, i.e. his power to vote (suffrage), which she had just cut off. She is called “Southern Democracy”, who holds up his hair (suffrage) to a White mob, i.e.Philistines, to indicate his power is gone and now is the time to attack the Black Samson, i.e. Black people.
As a short note, the Founding Fathers hated Democracy, which they called mobocracy or ‘mob rule’. On the contrary, they called the form of government they created a Republic, meaning rule of law, which we will later understand why this is so important.
3.Third, in the upper right-hand corner, Moses holds up the Ten Commandments, which the Democrats have changed the name to “VETO”. In other words, this portrays that the Democrats act as though they have God given authority to usurp or veto (redeem) any rights that were possessed legally by Blacks.
4.To the upper left of the image, depicts several Democrat men, i.e. the Philistines, charging to murder Samson. Among them includes former Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, who first led the massacre of Black soldiers at Fort Pillow and was later crowned as the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.
Tragically, also included is Robert E. Lee, who would never have taken part in this lynching; in spite of being the leader of the Confederate army!
5.In the upper middle part, the image contains “The Democratic Barbecue”. What were the Democrats barbecuing? Directing your attention to the middle left-hand corner of the image we find books burning. First, historically, the burning of books universally symbolizes the rejection of the freedom of speech which is still true of Democrat policies today!
Yet, the worst part of this book-burning reveals the presence of the Bible! In other words, the visual of a ‘burning Bible’ teaches in order for Democrats to fulfill their demonic objective of ‘Southern Redemption’** i.e. re-enslaving Blacks, they must rid themselves of the Bible!!
Yet, in reality, the fact that the Democrats burned the Bible should not be a surprise! As we will see in the next Tidbit, to this day Democrat political positions still reject the Word of God!
In short, because every nation has a god or gods (Ps33:12; Ps96:5):
1.the replacement of Moses’ Ten Commandments with “VETO”,
2.along with burning the Bible, is a clear rejection of the ‘rule of law’, i.e.the law of God
…commit the sin of blasphemy, and is a clear visual the Biblical God is ‘NOT’ the God of the Democrat party!!
*Harper's Weekly, A Journal of Civilization was an American political magazine based in New York City. Published by Harper & Brothers from 1857 until 1916, it featured foreign and domestic news, fiction, essays on many subjects, and humor, alongside illustrations. It carried extensive coverage of the American Civil War, including many illustrations of events from the war. During its most influential period, it was the forum of the political cartoonist Thomas Nast. Source: Wikipedia “Harper’s Weekly”
He advocated the abolition of slavery, opposed racial segregation, and deplored the violence of the Ku Klux Klan.
Source: Wikipedia “Thomas Nast”
**It is not ironic that the term “Southern Redemption” uses the word “redemption”, which Biblically refers to Jesus’ blood paying the cost of our salvation. Once again, this is blasphemy, which removes their mask, uncovering the true face of the Democrat party.
By thinking and acting affirmatively in this minute, you will influence the hour, the day, and in time, your entire life. -Denis Waitley
First, a short history of the Klan. History.com says that the KKK began on December 24, 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee. The word is derived from the Greek word kyklos, meaning circle. In 1867 they began meeting in local branches, calling themselves the “Invisible Empire of the South”. Their first Grand Wizard or Grand Pupa was General Nathan Bedford Forest1* of the Confederate Army who perpetrated the Fort Pillow massacre of surrendered Blacks.
I say it often: the Democrat party did not create racism, but they certainly perfected it!! How do I come to such a seemingly outlandish conclusion? Because the overwhelming evidence points directly at the Democrat party as the creators of the infamous Ku Klux Klan! If there is a group of people that fits the description of perpetrators of one of the more dastardly sins identified in scripture…it is the KKK:
“…inventors of evil things…” -Romans 1:30
And I repeat for emphasis, the KKK is the child of the Democrat Party!!
Allow me to offer two pieces of evidence:
The Congressional report of the ‘Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States’ (a 13 volume set) was first published in 1968 of events that happened primarily in 1871 & 72. In this report, southern states like North & South Carolina, Georgia, and Mississippi offer written records of government interviews of people who testified identifying the KKK as the culprit of the crimes of murder, robbery, intimidation etc., of Blacks & Republicans. For example on page 97, of Volume 3, South Carolina, the following interview is recorded:
Question. So far as your information goes, are the persons who commit these outrages, these young men, let them be organized or not, all of one political party?
Answer: why I say so. It is a sweeping remark, it is true, but almost nine hundred and ninety- nine out of every thousand of the decent people of South Carolina belong to the democratic party, or to the reform party. And when anything of that sort is done, I take it for granted that they (the KKK) belong to the reform party, or our party, the democratic party. In South Carolina the republican party is composed entirely of the colored people.
Question. Do you include in the nine hundred and ninety-nine out of every thousand the men who commit these outrages ?
Answer. Yes, sir; I suppose they (KKK) belong to our party, or the democratic party. 2*
This kind of evidence implicating the KKK is repeated in other volumes too:
1.Volume 2, pg 220, North Carolina;
2.Volume 11, pg 286, Mississippi
3.Volume 9, pg 899, Alabama
Etc., etc., etc.,
The testimonies of the Black representatives that I mentioned over the last several tidbits incriminate the Democrats as creators of the KKK and the perpetrators acting under the hoods the White Knights of the Klu Klux Klan.
For example, South Carolina Representative Robert Brown Elliot regarding a bill before Congress in 1871 to prosecute Klan violence declared: “I have sworn the declared purpose of the Ku Klux organization, and I refer to the official records of nearly every southern state during the past ten months to show how that bloody purpose has in part been executed. This bill will tend in some degree to prevent its full achievement.” Brown Elliot continues: “The White Republican of the South is also hunted down and murdered or scourged for his opinion’s sake, and during the past two years, more than 600 men of the south of both races have perished in my State alone. Yet, sir, it is true that these masked murderers strike chiefly at the black race….” “Simply because he exercises his privileges as an American freeman, you (Democrats) would drive him into exile with the pitiless lash, or doom him to swift murder---seeking your revenge for political power lost by moving at midnight along the path of the assassin!”3*
Obviously, if a bill before Congress regarding Klan violence is being debated, the Klan must indeed exist. And, obviously, because Brown Elliot is a Black Republican (as were all Blacks in Congress at that time) who is accusing the Democrats of doing nothing to quell the violence, nor the murders, this supports the view that Democrats are complicit in the Klan terrorism throughout the South!!!
In addition, Black Representative James Rapier of Alabama minces no words, and directly accuses the Democrats of Klan violence:
“They (Democrats) were hunting me down as the partridge on the mount, night and day with their Ku Klux Klan, simply because I was a Republican and refused to bow at the foot of their Baal.4*
In other words, these two Black Republican Representatives link the KKK with the Democrat party. They both are fighting to pass a bill before Congress that is designed to prosecute Klan violence…and the Democrats are all in opposition!!! The only reason the Democrats would oppose such a bill is that they are in agreement with the Klan violence
In conclusion, the historical interviews and the Black Republican Representatives provide overwhelming and irrefutable evidence that the Democrat party was complicit with the KKK and sanctioned its violence. The Democrat Party is responsible for the Ku Klux Klan!!! 5*
1* As a side note, Forrest later gave his life to Christ and repented of his sins!
2*‘Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States’, Vol III, p.97, testimony of E.W. Sweibels on June 22,1871.
--This is a 13 volume Congressional Report from 1871, 1872!!!!
3* Congressional Globe, 42nd Congress, 1st Session (Washington, DC: Congressional Globe Office, 1871), pg 390-92, Rep Robert Brown Elliot addressing the KKK Bil, April 1, 1871.
4* Congressional Record, 43rd Congress, 1st Session, Vol2. Pg4785, Rep. James T. Rapier’s speech on the Civil Rights Bill, June 9, 1874.
A special thanks to David Barton, ‘Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black and White’, Wallbuilders Press, 2004, for the hard work of digging out this information.
“A thought which does not result in an action is nothing much, and an action which does not proceed from a thought is nothing at all.” -Georges Bernanos,