‘Social Justice Fallacies’-2

I’m using Thomas Sowell’s book ‘Social Justice Fallacies’* to help uncover the deception perpetrated by liberals on our nation in their pursuit of what they call ‘Social Justice’. In his book Sowell identifies many of the fallacies and systemically refutes them. Let’s begin.
   Liberalism has had its greatest success specializing in sowing division in America by its use of  the word ‘equality’. Equality’s original (and Biblical) definition refers to the human nature. For example, humans are equal in nature…because of the Image and likeness of God(Gen1:26). However, liberals have redefined ‘equality’ to mean ‘the same amount’. Using their re-definition, they have successfully created an atmosphere of division in America leading to anger and hatred by marketing pseudo philosophies such as: “the Disparity of Income among races.”
   Beginning of page 8-9, Sowell writes on the ‘Origins of Inequalities’:  “Unequal circumstances begin in the womb. Research has shown nutritional differences among pregnant women reflected later in IQ differences among their children, when these children were old enough to be tested. Mothers’ intakes of various substances can have positive or negative effects on a child’s IQ and general well-being.”
   “Even where we might reasonably expect to find the greatest equality of developed capabilities—among children born to the same parents raised in the same home- research going back as far as the nineteenth century, including countries on both sides of the Atlantic, has shown that children who are the first-born in their family have, as a group, higher average IQs, a higher rate of college completion, and are over-represented among high achievers  in a variety of endeavors.”
    “In the United States, for example, a study found that more than half the National Merit Scholarship finalists were a first-born child, even in five-child families, as well as in two-child, three-child and four-child families. In other words, in five-child families, the first-born was the finalist more often than the other four siblings combined. Other measures of educational success or career success have likewise shown the first-born---and an only child—to be over-represented among the top performers in various endeavors, whether in the United States or among top performers in other countries surveyed.”
   On page 10, Sowell continues, “Conversely children raised where there is only one parent present have been found in a number of studies to have a higher incidence of many social problems—again, both in the United States and on the other side of the Atlantic. Studies of boys raised without a father present have found them very much over-represented among people with pathologies ranging from truancy to murder.”
   “As one study put it, these pathologies were more highly correlated with fatherlessness than with any other factor, surpassing even race and poverty. Fatherless boys had a higher than average rate of incarceration, whether they were black or white, though the incidence of fatherless boys has been higher among blacks. Not all differences between races are due to race---either in the sense of genetics or in the sense of racial discrimination.”
   “Clearly, there were no “equal chances” for these boys whether the were treated fairly or unfairly by people they encountered in institutions ranging from schools to police departments. Girls were also affected negatively, as reflected in such things as higher rates of teenage pregnancy, when raised by one parent. Very similar patterns of pathology were found in England, where the ethnic makeup of the underclass is very different from that in the United States. In England, the underclass is predominantly white, but it shows many social patterns very similar to the social patterns of low-income blacks in the United States, even though the English underclass has no legacy of slavery to be used as an automatic explanation.”
   Obviously, these facts don’t sit well with contemporary liberalism which blames America’s ‘Disparities’ on ‘racism’--by which they have now redefined to mean ‘White racism’.** In other words, liberals contend that Blacks and people of color, who are branded as “marginalized” minorities, whose suffering is due to the oppression of White people, i.e.White supremacy!
   Of course, the folly of such a position is completely refuted by vast numbers of Blacks and people of color who are successful in America.
 
 
 
*FYI, I purposefully left out his footnotes to save space. If you want to know the origin of his information, i.e.studies, you will have to purchase the book.
**The word ‘racism’ has been re-defined to mean ‘White racism’. This is why liberals do not believe Blacks can be racist.
 
Quotebit
If you don't design your own life plan, chances are you'll fall into someone else's plan. And guess what they may have planned for you? Not much.     -Jim Rohn