“But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV) This means wisdom is known by what it produces.  

   White Privilege is an unnatural focus on the color of Whiteness; and by default, an unnatural focus on Blackness (as well as any other skin color). Because skin color is one of the least important aspects of a human being, to concentrate on it creates racism; and as contemporary liberalism has proven, ultimately contributes to legislating racism. Allow me to offer more evidence for this real-life fact.

 1.For many decades, African witchdoctors in several countries have been known for murdering albinos and using body parts for rituals, because of their skin color. Now Albinism (people without the chemical melanin), which is called ‘whiteness’ is being blamed for the coronavirus.
Dr. Charlotte Baker, Director of the UK-based Albinism in Africa Network, reports, "It is the perceived whiteness of people with albinism. It is being interpreted that they are carriers of what is seen as a white man's disease. It comes from China where people have fair skin in the African mindset and so they are seen as carriers of this disease. It's another dimension of the stigma attached to albinism."
 
2.Hindu gods. Inspired by Black Lives Matter advocate Shaun King who declared all the murals and stained glass of a white Jesus, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, announced he would review the statues of Jesus in Britain; who in turn inspired Indian economist Rupa Subramanya to declare, “"We must also ask why Hindu deities are so light skinned. Very few Indians in real life are actually that fair...” In response Indians attacked Ms Subramanya declaring “Hindu gods are black, blue, yellow, red, white, and pink”. One twitter user responded, “Goddess Kali, Krishna, Shiva, Ram and so many other gods are never light skinned! In fact, in southern India so many goddesses like Mariyamma, Chamundeshwari etc. are never light-skinned.”
   Subramanya later responded that she was not an expert in Hinduism. Embarrassing herself by attempting to take her place in “Woke” crowd, Ms Subramanya is the exact consequence of people who place an inordinate focus on the color of Whiteness—or any skin color…for that matter!
 
3.African-American Rhoda Mhiripiri-Reed, who is Hopkins Public Schools Superintendent, is demanding teachers “examine their whiteness and the role it plays in perpetuating racism”. Mhiripiri-Reed continues, “we need to examine the role that whiteness plays in our macro-system of white supremacy,” and it’s not the “responsibility of people of color to fix racism, or to explain to white people how not to be racist.”
   If you pay close attention to how Mhiripiri-Reed uses the word “racism” in her comments, you will notice that by “racism” she means “White racism”. In other words, liberals have used Word Manipulation to change the definition of “racism” to “White racism”. This is done for three reasons: 1.to make all racism equal to White racism; 2.to make all Whites racists; 3.to prohibit Blacks from being racists.
    Of course, this is not only racist, but blasphemy. Why? Because it removes racism from the category of sin, and re-categorizes it under “Whiteness”. On the contrary, only God can define sin!
 
4.“The Seattle Public Schools Ethnic Studies Advisory Committee (ESAC) released a rough draft of notes for its Math Ethnic Studies framework in late September, which attempts to connect math to a history of oppression.” “It is also stated in the document that Western mathematics is “used to disenfranchise​ people and communities of color.””
   Of course, one cannot leave-out the role of America in all this, for the document continues, “math is oppressive, and the US government racist.” On the contrary, only liberal logic can declare math racist, and in the same breath, encourage a leap from the racism of math to the racism of America!!
   Moreover, the liberal Seattle school system is simply a continuation of the tradition of connecting math and racism. For example, years prior to the Ethnomathmatics of the ESAC, “A University of Illinois math professor, Rochelle Gutierrez believes that algebra and geometry perpetuate “white privilege” because Greek terms give Caucasians unearned credit for the subject.”  Dr Gutierrez continues, “On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness, who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community who is generally viewed as White.”
   Refusing to be left out of the “wokeism”, the liberal state of Oregon now promotes “Dismantling Racism in Math Instruction.”  “In a February 2021 bulletin sent out by the Oregon Department of Education, just below a feature on Black History Month, is a notice announcing a “micro-course” for educators titled: “A Pathway to Math Equity.” The course promises to provide educators with “key tools for engagement [and] strategies to improve equitable outcomes for Black, Latinx, and multilingual students” and knowledge on how to “dismantle racism in mathematics instruction.”
“We see white supremacy culture show up in the mathematics classroom even as we carry out our professional responsibilities” explains the guide. Educators must therefore take on the responsibility for “visibilizing the toxic characteristics of white supremacy culture with respect to math.” So, according to Seattle and Oregon, math is now racist!!
 
5.Seattle is not finished: “Spirit Murder”. “Investigative reporter Christopher Rufo reported that the Seattle public schools were giving a training program to teachers that instructed them to “bankrupt their white privilege” as well as “commit to the journey” of anti-whiteness while discussing “spirit murder,” which is the idea that Americans schools “murder the souls of Black children every day through systemic, institutionalized, anti-Black, state-sanctioned violence. The trainers begin by claiming that teachers are colonizers of Native American ‘ancestral lands”’ and that ‘the United States was built off the stolen labor of kidnapped and enslaved Black people’s work, which created the profits that created our nation.’”
   If White American teachers murder the spirits of Black children EVERYDAY in public schools, I wonder when and how this so-called “Spirit Murder” started? Black Economist and historian, Thomas Sowell, writes in ‘Black Rednecks and White Liberals’(pgs 35-36), “In 1866, over 1400 Northern White teachers, most young and single, from dozens of missionary associations in New England left their comfortable homes to teach Black children in 975 Southern schools.  Most of the schools were one-room shanty’s in rural areas where most Blacks lived.” This was extremely dangerous because it was against the law to educate Black people, and some teachers were murdered!!!  However, in spite of the risk, the next year, in 1867, an additional 1100 young missionary teachers went south. By 1870, there were over 2500 northern teachers educating Blacks in over 2000 schools.  On this movement, W.E.B. Du Bois, the first Black to earn a Ph.D. from Harvard declared, “to plant the New England college in the South was the salvation of the South and the Negro” (‘Black Rednecks and White Liberals’, pg38).
   These White teachers: 1.risked their literal lives; 2.sacrificed their own careers; 3.Were paid little to nothing…to commit “Spirit Murder” on Black people?!?!?!?! Really?!!? And what’s more, since 1866, tens of millions of Black kids have been educated by White people all over America--and I am one of them!!! “Black Spirit Murder” is yet another liberal racist myth!
   These 5 examples are just a few more consequences of the liberal doctrine of White Privilege, i.e.Whiteness…which is nothing more than ‘Liberal Racism’ by another name!
 
 
 
QuoteBit
If you are not willing to become a fool, you cannot become a master”  - Jordan Peterson

“But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV) This means wisdom is known by what it produces.  
 
   Another consequence of White Privilege (Whiteness) is redefining, marketing, and legislating racism. It is critical to note, liberalism’s promotion of WP is neither to mitigate nor rid the world of racism---and I repeat, but to promote it! Why? Because WP gives them:
1.Power. The ultimate liberal objective is total control, which is why they both invented  and enforce the Cancel Culture.
2.Wealth. Billions of dollars are given by government and private individuals to certain groups (Black Lives Matter) in order to continue and establish racism.
3.Moral Authority. Liberalism possesses the ‘Messianic Syndrome*’, which allows them to coerce power and money from the government and private individuals, for example George Soros and Jack Dorsey.
 
Allow me to offer a short-list of acts of Liberal Racism created by WP advocates.
1.Associate Press now capitalizes the word “Black” when referring to race, but not “white”. The reason offered is: “White people generally do not share the same history and culture, or the experience of being discriminated against because of skin color.” AP’s vice president, Daniszewski declares. Does this news organization literally believe this act will rid the world of racism, especially White racism? Of course not!! Remember, neither racial equality nor harmony is their objective. Martin Luther King said, “Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.” Is this AP act a revelation of love to drive out White hatred? Once again, of course not!
   On the contrary, AP’s action increases racism:
i.It creates anger in Whites, because not capitalizing a letter is just another of many ways created to demean White people. This trivial act’s purpose is to exacerbate ‘White Guilt’, designed to lead to White genuflection. On the contrary, kneeling to a man, or receiving kneeling from a man…are both idolatry.
ii.It creates anger in Blacks. No rational Black person believes capitalizing a letter of a word…affects White racism--in any way!!! AP’s trivial act assumes Blacks are stupid!!!! Furthermore, it has the potential to promote in other Blacks the thinking: “we are just a bit better!” Yet, for a race to believe it is better than other races…is the very definition of racism.
 
2.Oprah Winfrey declared, “Whites have a leg up. You still have your whiteness. That's what the term 'white privilege' is. It means that whiteness still gives you an advantage, no matter. It is the fundamental issue.” This has got to be one of THE most ridiculous statements ever uttered out of Oprah’s mouth!!! Does the ‘Whiteness’ of a White redneck, hillbilly, living in a trailer home in Kentucky, strung out on crack cocaine and alcoholism, have a “leg up” on arguably the richest woman in America (White or Black)? Oprah is a billionaire who owns, houses, cars, a jet, businesses, tv shows etc. Does she really believe her Blackness puts her a ‘leg down’ to White people?!?! On the contrary, this statement reveals Oprah’s Liberal racism!!!

3.The Southern Poverty Law Center declared of American teachers: “Weaponizing whiteness happens in schools every day”, which leads to Blacks being expelled from school more often. What is their evidence? A 2016 study which uses “eye-tracking” technology. Researchers found that preschool teachers “show a tendency to more closely observe black boys, when challenging behaviors are expected.”  The study found teachers watch Black girls 10%; White girls 13%; White boys 34%; and Black boys 42%.
   It is interesting to note that they used the higher rate for Black boys for their proof, but ignored the lower rate of Black girls? Why?!?! If these statistics prove that White teachers are racist, does this mean the White teachers hate Black boys, but not Black girls? What happens when teachers are Black or Hispanic? Was their propensity the same as the White teachers? If so, is the Black teacher racist against the Black boys?!!?! If not…why not?!?!?
   This is absolutely absurd! Could it be that the teachers watched certain kids because they misbehaved more? Why does every disparity have to be racial?!?! I mean, the boys’ propensity to be watched by teachers is 3-4 times more than the girls…is that racial? Why does this not mean the teachers hate the boys more than girls?!??!
   And what’s even more absurd is that these liberals would create “eye-tracking” technology on pre-school teachers…for racism! Is America now North Korea?!?! And what’s more, how does the ‘eye-tracking’ device work when the teacher turns his/her back on the presumed ‘eye-tracker’??!?!?
 
4.After knocking out former Black NBA player Nate Robinson in a boxing match, White Youtuber Jake Paul was asked by Jemele Hill: “And, this is our question of the week. So, I’m going to ask Jake Paul, right here in front of all of America: Considering where we are in our racial conversation in America, was what you did to Nate Robinson, racist?” Then she laughed! Immediately, detractors will respond, “Oh she was joking!” The only problem is, after some back and forth, moments later Jake was asked again, this time by Cari, “First and foremost, was it racist to knock a Black man out? That is the question of the week!” Jake responded, “Stop asking me that! I said NO!” First, obviously he did not think they were joking! And second, the two women only laughed to have a “fall-back” option button: “Hey, we were only joking!” should they be called-out for the year of 2020’s most racist question!  These two women used the same language when asking this question—in other words, they planned these shenanigans!!!
   I mean, both Jemele and Cari were once ‘sports’ commentators—are they so stupid to believe, that we would believe, that they never saw a White boxer knock-out a Black man? Or, is anyone so stupid to believe that Blacks always beat White people in sports---except for when racism is involved?!?!?!
   My basketball coach at Georgetown University, the legendary John Thompson, used to say all the time, “a lot of truth is told in jest.” It is obvious that Jemele and Cari were trying to get an ‘emotional-rise’ out of Jake and say something racial, so they could accuse him of WP, and label him a racist! Why? To use Jake as evidence for the normal, liberal clap-trap: all Whites have WP; which goes to prove America is a White racist nation!! Remember, and ironically, Jemele and Cari are two Black women hosting and creating their own show…in White racist America!
   The bottom line is that these 4 examples are just a few evidences of a culture that now uses  the term ‘White Privilege’ to make ‘judging-inappropriately-by-race’ the new norm!! And, to make both Black and Liberal racism acceptable in America!!!
 
*The Messianic Syndrome believes “I am the Anointed One”. Therefore, my views are right. Of course, this is idolatry! 

Tidbit
Behind every world class athlete, there is a world-class coach. The same holds true in every business arena. Surround yourself with winning coaches.  - Denis Waitley

   “But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV), which means wisdom is known by what it produces.  
 
   Allow me to use the NMAAHC position paper just one last time, which they use to present evidence for the doctrine of ‘White Privilege’. Under the specific category of ‘Holidays’, the NMAAHC writes: “Based on Christian religions” as their opinion of ‘Whiteness’*. 
  This statement:
    1.illustrates the heart and mind of NMAAHC
    2.is a perfect example of the consequence of White Privilege
    3.is a perfect example of liberalism

   First, remember NMAAHC is a Black museum, designed to establish, record, and remember African-American history! Yet, their position paper continues to neither regard, nor respect contemporary American Blacks, nor American Black history!!! Even a cursory review of American history reveals that Blacks have an over 300-year history of Christianity in this nation! The incredible move of God’s Spirit to convert slaves to Christ, in spite of the fact that many of their owners also claimed Christianity, can be described as nothing less than a miracle; a wonder; a sign--to the World--of God’s power, love, and mercy…to Black people! I repeat, to the natural mind, the idea that Black slaves could have literally adopted the religion of their owners is an incomprehensible enigma! Why? It is only natural for slaves to hate the deity whom gave the right and power to the masters to own them! Yet, this did not happen in America!** Although, I have yet to completely prove it, but it is my suspicion that this miracle is true of no other human enslavement in the history of the world!!!
   Now, back to my point. But…why did the Black slaves adopt the God of their owners? Obviously, it began with God’s power to bring revival to the slaves—using first Whites and then Blacks to evangelize them. But what is also critical to note is that the Providential God wanted to create an irrefutable witness to the world, for all times, of His power upon, and His approval of:
     1.America as a nation
     2.Black people as an integral part of this nation
 
   However, this does not mean:
      1.All the slaves were saved; or even that a majority of slaves were
         saved. God often imputes His grace to a remnant, not necessarily a
         majority.
      2.The slave owners were all saved. ‘Christianization’ is not
          synonymous with literal salvation, which is only by grace through
          faith(Eph2:8,9).
      3.That God approves of slavery.
 
   On the contrary, because slavery cannot save you, Black slaves did not become Christians because of their enslavement; for oppression does save the oppressed. Furthermore, White owners were neither saved nor lost…because they owned slaves! Remember Philemon, the person to whom Paul wrote a letter in the Bible…was a slave owner---yet he was saved, i.e.a Christian. On the contrary, all salvation comes through Christ…alone(Act4:12; Eph2:8,9), not through either good nor bad works.
   Tragically, in recent decades, liberalism has turned the hearts of many contemporary Black people away from the Christian faith of our forefathers and foremothers! The NMAAHC is just one of many examples!
   Let’s take a moment to examine the NMAAHC horrific view that American holidays--of which nearly every one is Christian--are examples of Whiteness. Take Christmas first, which is by far, the number one American holiday. Christmas is a day set aside to remember the birth of Jesus, the Son of God, Whom gave His life in death(Heb2:9) for the world (Jn3:16) to be saved. The definition of the “world” in John 3:16 includes every human regardless of skin color. But now, NMAAHC comes along and calls this marvelous, wonderful holiday…an example of Whiteness!?!?! Are you kidding me?!!!??! This is blasphemy!!!
   Yet, I fully understand why the NHAAMC would label Christmas ‘Whiteness’!!! Because the liberal view of ‘Whiteness’ is tantamount to White racism; and because White racism is considered bad, liberals link Christmas with White racism because their desire is to rid the nation of its foundation(Ps11:3), which is the Judaeo-Christian ethic! Why would liberals desire such a terrible thing? Because liberalism is a doctrine of atheism!! And atheism hates the God of the Bible, because He is the only true God(Jn17:3)! As a matter of fact, to pursue liberalism is synonymous with the pursuit of atheism…for liberalism leads to atheism!
    2Thessalonians 2:11 states, “…God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.” Through liberalism, America is encountering the wrath of God described in 2Thessalonnians 2:11, where people are calling good evil, and evil good(Is5:20)--willfully choosing to believe a lie…in plain view!!!
  In conclusion, my argument for Christmas can be made for other American holidays, such as Resurrection Day, Thanksgiving, July 4th, Valentine’s Day, and St Patrick’s Day, etc. The incredible part of all this deceit is that NO American Holiday is based upon ‘Whiteness’—not even Halloween!!!
   On the contrary, this hideous, liberal position of the NHAAMC perfectly illustrates a consequence of adopting the spirit of White Privilege—judging everything and everyone by skin color!
   In short, this NHAAMC viewpoint is yet another reason to reject White Privilege! It is a doctrine of devils(1Tim4:1) that does nothing but divide, conquer, promote atheism, and reject the Word of God! It is a philosophy of the flesh, i.e.the sin nature:
          “Thus says the Lord, “Cursed is the man who trusts in mankind,
           And makes flesh his strength, and whose heart turns away from
          the Lord” (Jer17:5)!
 
           “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and
            empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to
            the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to
​             Christ”  (Col2:8)
 
 
*“Whiteness” is THE foundation of WP. Christians...please take a moment and think about this!!
**I have read many biographies and autobiographies of slaves, and one thing stands out: their non-hatred for Whites!
 
Tidbit
“It is not what you get that makes you successful, it is what you are continuing to do with what you’ve got.” – Denis Waitley

The Source of Dr Martin Luther King's Freedom
   On August 28, 1963, Dr Martin Luther King gave his "I have A Dream" speech, which is arguably one of the most famous speeches in American history. That day, the massive, racially diverse crowd at the Lincoln Memorial heard the 'presence' and 'belief' of a 'higher moral authority' on human freedom. What moral authority was that? A few of MLK's statements reveal its source:
1. "...a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand signed the Emancipation Proclamation..."  MLK referred to President Abraham Lincoln.
2."When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence"
3."...for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone."
4."I still have dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream."
5."I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together." Taken from Isaiah 40:4,5, of the Bible.
   These 5 statements reveal three areas of authority:
            1.Declaration of Independence (1774) and Constitution (1787)
            2.Emanicpation Proclamation (1863)
            3.Bible, i.e.God
 
First, through a bit of research, we find the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution have their roots in the Bible*. Second, after many intense personal internal and external conflicts throughout the year of 1862, and in fulfillment of a promise to God, Abraham Lincoln declared the Emancipation Proclamation. Third, Dr King quoted Isaiah 40:4,5 during the course of his speech. And fourth, Dr King was a preacher of the gospel, whom God obviously raised-up for "such a time as this" (Est4:14).
   To the truth-seeker, we can technically reduce the origin of Dr King's final authority to one source: the Word of God, i.e.the Judaeo/Christian God!
Finally, using Dr King's point 4 on the American dream, we understand that Dr King's call to freedom did not begin with the 1960's Civil Rights movement, but dates back to our founding! For this reason, Dr King appealed to the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, America's Founders, and the Bible for his authority! Following is the evidence:
 
Presidents
First, a witness of freedom exists from every President in American history...following are three examples! During the War for Independence, George Washington said, "The General hopes and trusts that every officer and man will endeavor to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country."
Our second president John Adams said, "...it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand." The "religion" to which President Adams referred was not Hinduism, Buddhism, or Islam...but Christianity!
Or, how about Abraham Lincoln who declared at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, 1861: "The Declaration of Independence gave liberty not alone to the people of this country, but hope to all the world, for all future time. It was that which gave promise that in due time the weights would be lifted from the shoulders of all men, and that all should have an equal chance. This is the sentiment embodied in the Declaration of Independence... I would rather be assassinated on this spot than surrender it."
 
America's Dictionary
Webster's Dictionary took 26 years to complete. In 1828, Noah Webster wrote in the preface: "In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government ought to be instructed..."
 
Supreme Court
In 1892, the Supreme Court of the United States declared, "This is a Christian nation."
 
Congress
In 1853 Senate judiciary Committee. "Had the people during the revolution had a suspicion to war against Christianity, that revolution would have been strangled in its cradle. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the amendment the universal sentiment was that Christianity should be encouraged, not any one sect"
 
Money
"In God we Trust" is taken from Psalms 40:4 and Psalms 56:11
 
Monuments
On the Liberty Bell: Leviticus 25:10 is permanently engraved on the 1753 Liberty Bell:
"...and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof."
On the Washington Monument:"Holiness to the Lord" (Exodus 28:26, 30:30, Isaiah 23:18, Zechariah 14:20), "Search the Scriptures" (John 5:39), "The memory of the just is blessed" (Proverbs 10:7), "May Heaven to this Union continue its beneficence," and "In God We Trust", but the Latin inscription Laus Deo - "Praise be to God" - is engraved on the monument's capstone.
On the The Jefferson Monument: "God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."
On the Lincoln Monument: "we here highly resolve that . . . this nation under God . . . shall not perish from the earth"; "The Almighty has His own purposes. 'Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh' (Matthew 18:7)"; "as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said 'the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether' (Psalms 19:9)"; "one day every valley shall be exalted and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh see it together"
 
Education
Early Americans used the 'New England Primer', which taught the alphabet:
A-in Adam's Fall, we sinned all
B-Heaven to find, the Bible mind
C-Christ crucified, for sinners died
D-The deluge drowned, the earth around
E-Elijah hid, by ravens fed
 
Furthermore, Ivy League schools were originally established to train preachers. For example, Harvard is named after John Harvard, a preacher of the gospel. Harvard's Rules & Precepts stated September 26, 1642: "Let every Student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies is, to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life. John 17:3."
   In conclusion, 'American freedom' was not only designed for Whites, but for Black people; and as Abraham Lincoln declared, even for all peoples of the world! Why? All freedom originates in God's love, and is a calling of God (Gal5:13 1Pet2:16, 2Cor3:17)...to all men!
   Therefore, Dr King's moral authority for 'freedom' did not originate with some liberal humanist philosopher...but in the Bible, which declares: all men possess the image and likeness of God (Gen1:28), therefore, all men are created equal, and are free!
Hence, unlike today's protests, MLK's 1960's civil rights movement was Holy Spirit inspired!!
  
*See books: Defending the Declaration by Gary Amos; and Christianity and the Constitution by John Eidsmoe.
 
QuoteBit
"Even if he fails again and again to accomplish his purpose -- as he must until weakness is overcome -- the strength of character gained will be the measure of his true success, and this will form a new starting point for future power and triumph.”                                                                     -As A Man Thinketh

 

 “But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV), which means
  wisdom is known by what it produces.  
 
   We have been examining some of the fruit of White Privilege on the fact sheet produced by The National Museum of African American History and Culture’ (NMAAHC). See attachment.
We examined 5 points from their first page, let’s move on to the second page. Here is their 6th point: 6.Religion: a.Christianity is the norm. b.Anything other than the Judaeo-Christian tradition is foreign. c.No tolerance for deviation from the single god concept.
 
6.You read that right…the NMAAHC’s 6th point of evidence for ‘Whiteness’, which is used to prove White Privilege….is Christianity! I repeat, a Black museum celebrating African-American History and Culture declares that Christianity is ‘Whiteness’ and therefore should be rejected because it contributes to White Privilege!!!!!!!!
    Volumes could be written to refute this absolutely insane NMAAHC point, but I will offer just a few points. Let’s begin with Black figures of American history.
Frederick Douglass (1817?-1895). On his conversion to Christ: “"I loved all mankind, slaveholder not excepted, though I abhorred slavery more than ever. I saw the world in a new light...”  Mr Douglas was a preacher of the gospel of Jesus Christ in the Zion African-America Methodist church!
Harriet Tubman (1822?-1913). After leading between 70 slaves from slavery, "Twant me, 'twas the Lord. I always told him, ‘I trust in you. I don't know where to go or what to do, but I expect you to lead me,’ and He always did."
George Washington Carver (1864?-1943)."Keep your hand in that of the Master, walk daily by His side, so that you may lead others into the realms of true happiness, where a religion of hate, (which poisons both body and soul) will be unknown, having in its place the 'Golden Rule' way, which is the 'Jesus Way' of life, will reign supreme."
Booker T. Washington (1856-1915)
"The men doing the vital things of life are those who read the Bible and are Christians and not ashamed to let the world know it...No man can read the Bible and be lazy."
Sojourner Truth 1797-1883
"I set up my banner, and then I sing, and then folks always comes up 'round me, and then...I tells them about Jesus."
   I could mention William Still, Harriet Jacobs, William Harvey Carney, John Roy Lynch, James Forten, Richard Allen, Harry Hoosier, Jerena Lee, William and Ellyn Craft…among literally millions of other Black Americans of history!!
    I could also include hundreds of millions of Blacks in our contemporary times from all over Africa, America, the West Indies, and South American countries…who are Christians!!!  Is the Christianity of millions of Black people ‘Whiteness’!?!?!? Or White Privilege’?
 
   Let’s move on to American history. The reason the NMAAHC can declare: “Christianity is the norm”, and use it as the evidence for ‘Whiteness’ or ‘WP’, is because they are obviously ignorant of American history!!! For example, beginning at Jamestown in 1607 and Plymouth Rock in 1620, both groups boldly declare ‘why’ they came to America: The Great Commission (Mat28:18-20)!  In other words, America was birthed as a missionary Nation to win the Indians to Christ, i.e.evangelism:
Virginia Charter (1606):Colony’s objective: “propagating of the Christian religion to such people as yet live in darkness and miserable ignorance of the true knowledge and worship of God.”
Mayflower Compact (1620): “In the Name of God, Amen!” “…for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian Faith.”
 
Denominations of 13 original Colonies
In 1607, Virginia was founded by Anglicans;
In 1620, Massachusetts was founded by Pilgrim Separatists & Puritans;
In 1626, New York was founded by Dutch Reformed;
In 1633, Maryland was founded by Catholics;
In 1636, Rhode Island was founded by Baptists;
In 1636, Connecticut was founded by Congregationalists;
In 1638, New Hampshire was founded by Congregationalists;
In 1638, Delaware founded by Lutherans;
In 1653, North Carolina was founded by Anglicans;
In 1663, South Carolina founded by Anglicans;
In 1664, New Jersey was founded by Lutherans;
In 1682, Pennsylvania was founded by Quakers;
In 1732, Georgia was founded by Protestants.
 
4 Presidents:
   Here are quotes from just 4 American presidents, although every president has claimed Christianity (including African-American President Barak Obama):
   Engraved on George Washington's tomb at Mount Vernon."I am the Resurrection and the Life; sayeth the Lord. He that believeth in Me, though he were dead yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth and believeth in Me shall never die."
---“The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity” -President John Adams
---“America was born in a Revival of Religion – and back of it were John Wesley and George Whitefield.”           – President Calvin Coolidge.
---“When I left Springfield [to assume the Presidency], I asked the people to pray for me. I was not a Christian. When I buried my son, the severest trial of my life, I was not a Christian. But when I went to Gettysburg and saw the graves of thousands of our soldiers, I then and there consecrated myself to Christ.”   -President Abraham Lincoln
 
Constitutional Convention
   The 55 delegates who wrote the U.S. Constitution belonged to the following denominations: 26 Episcopalian; 11 Presbyterian; 7 Congregationalist; 2 Lutheran; 2 Dutch Reformed; 2 Methodist; 2 Quaker; 2 Roman Catholics.
 
State Constitutions (every state constitution is similar to these):
--PENNSYLVANIA, the 2nd State to ratify the U.S. Constitution, stated in its 1776 State Constitution, signed by Ben Franklin: "Each member, before he takes his seat, shall...subscribe...'I do believe in one GOD, the Creator and Governor of the Universe, the Rewarder of the good and the Punisher of the wicked. And I do acknowledge the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by Divine Inspiration.'"
--NEW JERSEY, the 3rd State to ratify the U.S. Constitution, stated in its 1776 State Constitution: "All persons, professing a belief in the faith of any PROTESTANT sect, who shall demean themselves peaceably under the government...shall be capable of being elected."
--GEORGIA, the 4th State to ratify the U.S. Constitution, stated in its 1777 State Constitution: "Representatives shall be chosen out of the residents in each county...and they shall be of the PROTESTANT religion."
 
   University of Houston political science professors Donald Lutz and Charles Hyneman in 1985 published a monumental study that took them 10 years to bring together. They amassed over 15,000 items, including 2,200 books, newspaper articles, pamphlets and monographs of political materials written between 1760-1805 and discovered that there were three writers and one book, the constitutional framers quoted from most often:
1) John Locke (1632-1704)- 3%
2) Barron Charles Montesquieu (1689-1755) -8%
3) William Blackstone (1723-80), and -8%
4) Bible- 34%
   All three of the previous men were strong Christians, and used the Bible as the foundation for their government philosophy.
 
US Congress
In 1854, the U.S. Congress conducted an extensive 1 year investigation. Their final report concluded: “Had the people during the revolution ever had a suspicion of an attempt to war against Christianity that revolution would have been strangled in its cradle. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the amendments, the universal sentiment was Christianity should be encouraged, but not any one denomination. In this age, there can be no substitute for Christianity. It was the religion of the founders of the republic and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendents.”

US Supreme Court
In 1892, the US Supreme Court conducted a thorough study of American History cited over 60 historical precedents, the court concluded: “There is no dissidence in these declarations. There is a universal language pervading them all having one meaning, they affirm and reaffirm that this is a religious nation. This is a Christian nation.”
 
   Someone please tell the people at NMAAHC—along with every Black and White liberal: Of course “Christianity is the norm” in America! America was birthed from the God of the Bible, i.e.Christianity! Of course, “anything other than the Judaeo-Christian tradition is foreign”: a cursory study of American history reveals that it was Christians who created this nation! Of course, there is “No tolerance for deviation from the single god concept”, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; the God of the Bible--is the only God!!!  I repeat, there are no other gods than the God of the Bible!!!!!
               10.Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom
                I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and
                 understand that I am he: before me there was no God
                formed, neither shall there be after me. 11.I, even I, am the
                 LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.  -Is43:10,11
 
   In conclusion, President Thomas Jefferson said, "No nation has ever existed or been governed without religion. Nor can be." The truth of TJ’s quote originates from the Bible: “For all the gods of the nations are idols…” –Ps96:5. In other words, every nation has a god! However, only those nations whose God is the Lord are blessed. “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD…” (Ps33:12)
   The reason America has prospered (blessed by God) above any nation in the history of the world…is because we have made the God of the Bible…THE God of this nation! And I repeat, that one and only true God has honored His Word by blessing this nation!!!
   Why has the NMAAHC made such statements so easily verifiably false? Idolatry--which has led to their blindness! The foundation of White Privilege is the worship of Blackness!!!
 
QuoteBit
“There are no limits on our future if we don’t put limits on our people.”
JACK KEMP, Politician
 

​ “But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV), which means wisdom is  known by what it produces.   
   We have been examining some of the fruit of White Privilege on the fact sheet produced by The National Museum of African American History and Culture’ (NMAAHC). See attachment. So far, I covered their first four items. Let’s look at their point five. NMAAHC offers the following three things as examples of ‘Whiteness’: “1.Hard work is the key to success; 2.Work before play; 3.”If you didn’t meet your goals, you didn’t work hard enough.”  Remember, ‘Whiteness’ is the foundation for White Privilege, or the reason liberals believe WP is bad.
 
5.Protestant Work Ethic. You read it right, NMAAHC believes the ‘Protestant Work Ethic’ is  ‘Whiteness’.*
   In Thomas Sowell’s book ‘Black Rednecks and White Liberals’, on page 76, he lists the work ethic of certain ethnicities, some in America, and some in their own countries:
-Korean store-owners worked on average 63 hours per week, “with one-fifth working 80 hours or more.”
-“Early Lebanese businesses in the US were noted for opening 16-18 hours daily”
-“During the early rise of Chinese shopkeepers in Southeast Asia, 16-18 hour days were also common.”
   On page 159, Dr Sowell writes that a powerful negative consequence of former slave-owning societies was the creation of laziness in the indigenous population. Of course, the laziness of the indigenous population created yet another negative which manifested as, the immigrants passing the indigenous population economically!! For example, Dr Sowell writes of Italian immigrants to Brazil and Argentina(remember Brazil and Argentina once possessed slavery), who originally entered  those nations poorer than the previously existing White populations, but after time, “ultimately rose to a higher economic plane than the whites who had been born there.” How did this happen? Hard work and self-sacrifice of the immigrants!!!!
  On page 207, Dr Sowell writes of the incredible successes of all Black Dunbar High School in Washington D.C. During an 85 year stretch from 1870 to 1955, “most of its graduates went on to higher education. He says, “This was very unusual for either Black or White high school graduates during this era.” How did those Black kids accomplish such an incredible feat during the zenith of racism in America? Two words: Hard work!
   He continues offering another example of one Black female principal of Dunbar named Mary Jane Patterson, who formerly graduated from Oberlin College in 1862. At the end of her 12 years as principal of Dunbar, she was “noted for a strong, forceful personality, for thoroughness, and for being an indefatigable worker.” In other words, Ms Patterson’s hard work paid off in her success!
  My own ‘Black’ father worked two-jobs for 37 years! Because he dropped out of school at 8th grade, he could only secure work as a janitor. After being unable to make ends meet for a wife and 3 kids as a janitor, my dad attended barber school, and obtained his license. However, to work as a barber, and still retain his janitor position, he had to engineer a deal with the principal of Lowell elementary school. The deal consisted of him adjusting his hours from 7-4pm or 8-5pm, to 5am to 2pm. Why did he do this? To take on the second barbering job.
    How did he do this? After getting off work at Lowell at 2:00pm, he would often walk 10 minutes back home, eat dinner, which my mom prepared on her lunch hour, change clothes, and leave at 2:30pm and drive 30 minutes to Maywood, Illinois, where he worked from 3:00-9:00pm. After arriving home by 9:30pm, he would go straight to bed and get up at 4:30am to start all over again. On Saturday, he worked at the Barber shop from 8:00am-7:00pm. I repeat, he worked like this for 37 years! His hard work, and self-sacrifice allowed our family of five to purchase, and pay-off our own home, in a middle-class Black neighborhood in Wheaton, Illinois…where I never knew a day of hunger in my life!!!**
   I leave you with the highest authority on work--the Word of God! For example,
-Proverbs 14:23- “In all labour there is profit…”
-Proverbs 12:24-“The hand of the diligent will rule, while the slothful will be put to forced labor.”
-Proverbs 6:6-11 6.Go to the ant, O sluggard, Observe her ways and be wise,
7.Which, having no chief, Officer or ruler,
8.Prepares her food in the summer And gathers her provision in the harvest.
9.How long will you lie down, O sluggard? When will you arise from your sleep?
10 “A little sleep, a little slumber, A little folding of the hands to rest”--
11.Your poverty will come in like a vagabond, And your need like an armed man.
 
   The ant of Proverbs 6 is evidence to the fact that all of God’s creation is a witness of ‘work’; and specifically, the ant is a witness to ‘hard work’! From all over the world, people have come to America…and made it through the simple Bible-principle of: HARD WORK! Contrary to the racist NMAAHC…work has nothing to do with ‘Whiteness’!!!
   In conclusion, do you think the NMAAHC’s use of the phrase: ‘Protestant work ethic’ in the context of ‘Whiteness’ is an accident? On the contrary, the phrase ‘Protestant work ethic’ originates from the Bible. Protestant refers to a particular Christian doctrine in opposition to Catholic doctrine; and ‘work’ is a gift given by God to man to help sustain him on the earth. Please don’t be naïve…the ultimate objective of liberalism, which is the impetus behind the NMAAHC, is to remove the Judaeo/Christian ethic as a foundation for America!
   I’m sorry to say, through liberalism--many Black people are being deceived to rise up against this nation, which has facilitated greater Black success than any nation in the history of the world—including EVERY Black African nation!!!
 
 
*I wrote this segment on my dad in tears! I could not be more honored to be the son of a janitor!!!
 
Quotebit
Philosophy is the sum total of all that you know and what you decide is valuable. -Jim Rohn

 




 



 

                                                 Last time I used three verses to determine whether White Privilege is wisdom. This time let’s focus on Matthew 11:19(NKJV): “But wisdom is justified by her children”, which means wisdom is known by what it produces.
   In my last tidbit I began examining the fruit produced by The National Museum of African American History and Culture’ (NMAAHC). Please see the attachment. I covered their first three items in my last tidbit. Let’s look at their point 4.
 
4.“History”. The NMAAHC accuses America of “Whiteness”* because our history is: “based upon Northern European immigrant experience; focus on the British Empire; and the primacy of Western tradition and the Judaeo-Christian ethic.” (see attachment)
   
   I see at least 3 errors/deceptions in their statement:
I.First, the NMAAHC’s claim that because White people from Britain arrived on America’s shores with the intent of planting a settlement; and because they were also White Christians, who held to a Judaeo-Christian ethic assumes their Judaeo-Christian ethic, and Protestant ethic…‘IS’… “Whiteness”!! Remember, the NMAAHC defines “Whiteness” as: “a White dominant culture, or Whiteness, refers to ways of White people and their traditions…” In other words, they believe the Judaeo-Christian ethic, and a Protestant ethic, are “ways” and “traditions” of Whiteness!
   The first problem with this logic is that ‘Whiteness’ is a skin color, and skin colors have no “ways” and “traditions”! In other words, skin color is not an action, a way, or a tradition…it simply exists. At its foundation, the skin color of ‘Whiteness’ is no different than the skin colors of Black, Brown, Yellow, or Red, which are all God-created, differing only in the amount of the chemical melanin. On the contrary, one purpose of God for melanin is beauty…not “ways” or “traditions”!
   However, this first deception comes into focus when we understand that the NMAAHC’s objective is to substitute the ‘actions’ of the Judaeo-Christian ethic for melanin, i.e. skin tone, which they identify as ‘Whiteness’! The confirmation of my position is that if it were true that the Judaeo-Christian ethic “IS” ‘Whiteness’, how is it that Black, Brown, Yellow, and Red people also practice the Judaeo-Christian ethic? All over the world, people from every color are Christians and Jews, i.e. practice the Judaeo/Christian ethic…not just White people! I repeat, the Judaeo/Christian ethic has been practiced by every skin color in the history of the world!
 
II.The second deception is liberal racism. As any blind man can see, the foundation for NMAAHC’s position on ‘History’ is “Whiteness”, by which they really mean skin color, which they use to refer to “White people”! In other words, their thinking is simply defined as liberal racism. What does that mean? In other words, to make their point on ‘History’, they must use the “Whiteness” (skin color) of the British Christians who came to Jamestown and Plymouth Rock. Therefore, because they believe WP is bad, and because it is “Whiteness” that makes WP bad, and because “Whiteness” equals skin color, and because the British Christians were “White”, NMAAHC is forced to conclude that the British Christians are bad because of their “Whiteness”(skin color)!!! In other words, the NMAAHC statement is liberal racism, which in this particular situation means the “Northern European immigrant experience; focus on the British Empire; and the primacy of Western tradition and the Judaeo-Christian ethic” is bad because the people who perpetrated these three things are White people! But wait just-a-minute!!!! Is this not pre-judgment, i.e. prejudice based upon race, i.e.Whiteness, i.e.White people? Is this not the very definition of racism?!!?!?? Of course it is!
   Yet, in today’s culture, it is also known as liberal racism.
 
III.The third deception is the obvious NMAAHC disgust for the Judaeo/Christian ethic. Their terminology: “the primacy of Western tradition and the Judaeo-Christian ethic” is a clear, bold, statement linking the Judaeo/Christian ethic with ‘Whiteness’; which if you are still unclear is what they believe to be “THE” foundation for White Privilege!! Remember, “Whiteness” is bad, and because they just boldly declared the Judeao/Christian ethic is “Whiteness”, then they have boldly concluded that because “Whiteness” should be rejected, then the Judeao/Christian ethic should be rejected! Incredibly, the NMAAHC, i.e. the national Black museum, just literally attacked the faith of hundreds of millions of Black people…all over the world!
   And what is…by far…even more horrifying, is that this sort of deception is so often completely ignored by liberal Black Christians!!!  I would not be surprised that many of the people at the NMAAHC are in Black churches all over the Washington D.C. metropolitan area!!! Or what’s worse, the people who drafted this very NMAAHC abominable document will argue they are Christians!! In the latter day, many will depart from the faith(1Tim4:1)!!!!!
   Tragically, through the worship of ‘Blackness’, which is every bit as much idolatry as the worship of Molech or Baal, Black liberals simply ignore the fact that a National Black Museum insulted the faith of not only millions of contemporary authentic Black Christians, but just as importantly, the faith of our African-American forefathers and foremothers!*
   I mean, are liberal Black Christians unaware that---historically---Black slaves were overwhelmingly Christian? And, that it was the faith of the Black slaves, who stood on God’s deliverance of Israel from Egyptian slavery, in order to cry out to God for their deliverance from slavery? In other words, they used the Word of God, i.e. the Judaeo/Christian ethic!!!!!!
   I mean, how do you think Blacks were released from slavery? Do you think it was an accident?!?! Or, maybe Blacks rose-up and conquered the White slave-owners and delivered themselves? Do you have the temerity to believe that the God of “the Judaeo/Christian ethic” had no part in it? Allow me to help, nothing can happen—past, present, or future; either good or evil—without God’s involvement!  If something can happen apart from God’s control…He is not Sovereign…and we cannot pray for it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
   In reality, all history is Providential History. What is Providence? It is God sovereignly working in history to bring about His:
       i.His good will(Ps119:68)
       ii.His judgment on sin (Ps9:8;Ps82:8,Is26:9; Is66:16; Jer25:31; 
          Zeph3:8)
   Charles Kaufman offers a great definition of Providential History, “If you don’t see the divine hand behind the scenes, history becomes an incomprehensible enigma”. Noah Webster declared, “History is God’s providence in human affairs.” And finally, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “History, by apprizing them of the past, will enable them to judge the future.”
   By rejecting God, i.e.the Judaeo/Christian ethic…NMAAHC teaches American history is ‘Whiteness’! On the contrary, Providential History, i.e.God’s view of history, teaches that God has blessed America…a blessing that extends to all people, regardless of color—including Black people!
            For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for
            ou​r learning, that we through patience and comfort of the
             scriptures might have hope.
                           -Romans 15:4
            Choose you this day whom you will serve… (Josh24:15)!!!
 
*Why do Black liberals do this? For two reasons:
i.Any organization with the word “Black” in its title is assumed to help Black people.
ii.Therefore, they believe the NMAAHC helps Black people.
   On the contrary, because sin blinds, and the worship of Blackness is idolatry, i.e.sin, Black liberals are deceived to believe ‘Blackness’ helps Black people. In reality, only God’s word, i.e.the Judaeo/Christian ethic, sets the captive free(Jn8:31,32)…including Black people!!!
 
QuoteBit
Your philosophy determines whether you will go for the disciplines or continue the errors.
   -Jim Rohn

​      We need 3 verses today:
1.“But wisdom is justified by her children.” -Matt11:19 (NKJV) In other words, wisdom is known by what it produces.
2.James 3:14,17 teaches two types of wisdom:
a.Wisdom from above. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable,  gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and  without hypocrisy (Jms3:17).
b.Wisdom not from above. This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly,  sensual, devilish (Jms3:14)
 
   Notice James3:17 says one thing God’s wisdom produces is “without partiality”. The Greek word means impartial or undistinguished. Its’ root means to separate thoroughly, which means equally. For example, if you divide 6 by 3, you get 2…every time, no exceptions! How then does “without partiality” apply to White Privilege? If we plug WP into the previous division problem, what do we get? In order to answer honestly, we must examine the consequences of WP; or the product of WP.
   Let’s look at The National Museum of African American History and Culture(NMAAHC) in Washington D.C. It was established in 2003, and opened in 2016, for the purpose of documenting African-American life, history, and culture. In early 2020, under the category of “Talking About Race”, it released a fact sheet on their website entitled: “Aspects and Assumptions of Whiteness & the White Culture in the United States”.  The fact sheet was later removed because of the National uproar it created. However, its removal does not suggest NMAAHC no longer holds the views expressed in the fact sheet!
   I copied and downloaded the original NMAAHC pages of the fact sheet to my personal archives before they were removed from the website. Please see the attachment.
 
1.First, the obvious purpose of the fact sheet is to attempt to explain White Privilege(WP). Notice the methodology used to explain is what I call ‘Word Manipulation’, which I define in two ways: i.Creating new words; ii.changing definitions of traditional words.
   For example, notice the word choices used in the title: “Whiteness” and “White Culture”. While the words “White Culture” might be familiar, the idea of “Whiteness” requires some defining. If you check Dictionary.com’s definition of “whiteness”, it has no reference to skin color. It uses the traditional definition of ‘white’ to define “whiteness”, or the color of white; in other words— it does not mean white people. In other words, the dictionary has no definition for “whiteness”, which informs us that the word “whiteness” --as used by WP advocates and NMAAC---was invented. Well, the obvious meaning of whiteness as intended by NMAAC cannot mean anything other than white people. Let’s be honest—to whom else could it refer? But why would they create such a word? What is their intent? If you look how the word “Whiteness” is used in the main title, its’ context suggests an obvious negative connotation. In other words, NMAAC believes “whiteness” is something to reject or avoid, i.e. it is not good! Therefore, beginning with the negative undertone of the main title, we can expect to learn that the body of the fact sheet will teach us how ‘whiteness’ creates and continues racism…in racist America!!
 
2.The following titles on the first page of the fact sheet are NMAAC’s initial evidence for WP:
            a.Rugged individualism
            b.Family structure
            c.Emphasis on Scientific method
            d.History
            e.Protestent Work Ethic
 
Unlike the main title, these subtitles look very positive. However, because of what we know from the main title, subconsciously we understand the subtitles to:
            i.Teach that you must reject ‘whiteness’, if you want to be a good
               person
            ii.But, in order to reject ‘whiteness’, we must agree to reject the
                points on this fact sheet beginning with the above 5 points(a-
                e).
 
Let’s review a couple of the points a-e. Notice each of the points used to describe ‘whiteness’ or ‘white culture’ are traditional, success principles given to mankind by God. As a matter of fact, all three pages have points rooted in the Judaeo-Christian ethic, i.e.the Bible. As I read through this fact sheet for the first time, I immediately saw its purpose: the rejection of the Judaeo-Christian ethic by associating God’s word with the dreaded ‘whiteness’!!! Actually, to be perfectly candid, the rejection of the Judaeo-Christian ethic…is the final objective of White Privilege!
   To support my previous assertion, let’s look at “Rugged Individualism”. First, God created Adam, and then Eve, who subsequently had children. In other words, God created mankind as individuals(Gen1,2)-- beginning with Adam! Second, salvation is individual because it requires each person to come to Christ through repentance(Rom10:9,10). Lastly, Jesus the individual, died on the cross alone, to atone for each individual person’s individual sin. In other words, the Bible teaches individualism! When the NMAAHC uses “Rugged Individualism” to prove their assertion that “whiteness” is not good, they are literally attacking the Word of God!
   How about “Family Structure”? After creating Adam and Eve, God joined them together in marriage, commanding them to reproduce, calling the results ‘family’; which by the way is ‘THE’ foundational structure God ‘sovereighly’ designed for humanity. As a matter of fact, every culture, religion, tongue, nation etc., from the beginning of time, has possessed the ‘nuclear family’ structure—that sadly--NMAAHC declares is an example of ‘whiteness’!! On the contrary, because NMAAHC defines the ‘whiteness’ of WP using the nuclear family as their example is one of the greatest reasons WP is a doctrine from a false god!  What god? Either atheism or liberalism! At its’ core, NMAAHC’s views are idolatry!!!
   What about “Emphasis on Scientific Method”? NMAAHC boldly asserts, “Emphasis on Scientific Method” is an example of ‘whiteness’ or the white culture. The evidence they use for such presumption is: “objective, rational linear thinking”. In other words, and I repeat, to “Emphasize the Scientific Method, by using objective, rational linear thinking”…is ‘whiteness’…according to the NMAAHC!!!
   Of course, the folly of condemning: ‘objective, rational, linear thinking' as a by-product of ‘whiteness’, one must use ‘objective, rational, linear thinking’!!! Therefore, NMAAHC’s condemnation of ‘objective, rational, linear thinking’, is itself a self-contradictory!!!
   On the contrary, ‘objective, rational, linear thinking’ is a result of the rational, logical God of order(Jer31:35-36), who created the Laws of logic(Col1:16;Col2:3)*, along with a consistent universe(Gen1), which can only be understood through God’s gift to man—the human mind-- which was designed to use: ‘objective, rational, linear thinking’!!
   Dr John Oller Jr writes, “Scientific inquiry depends upon the premise that there is order in the universe. If this premise were not true, science would be meaningless.” I repeat, in order to understand the ‘order’ in the universe, one must use ‘objective, rational, linear thinking’!!!
So far…can the NMAAHC fact sheet be considered “without partiality”? I think not!
  
 *Law of non-contradiction (LNC); Law of Identity(LID); Law of Excluded Middle(LEM)
 
Quote Bit
If you learn to set a good sail, the wind that blows will always take you to the dreams you want, the income you want, and the treasures of mind, purse, and soul you want.      -Jim Rohn

   In tidbit 5, I addressed Dr Joy DeGruy’s personal experience used to define WP. Now, I would like to address two more of Dr Peggy McIntosh’s 26 points--randomly chosen, by the way--she uses to define WP (See Tidbit 4 for her list). Remember, Dr Peggy McIntosh is considered the original standard for WP.
   Let’s begin with: “15.I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group.”   First, 2Corinthians 2:11 instructs us not to be ignorant of the schemes/devices of the devil. One scheme of liberalism is to divide people into groups.[DJ1]  According to ‘liberal theology’ (Col2:8) every person is placed in a group, or assigned a group. For example, following are some of the groupings liberals use for people: Blacks, Whites, Latinos, lesbians, gays, transgenders, pro-choice, anti-abortionists, rich, poor, men, women, Marxists, capitalists etc.
   Whereas God begins with the individual, Whom He created in His image and likeness (Gen1:26-28), liberals begin with groups, which they use for moral authority to coerce political power.
   Therefore, liberal political opinions (Col2:8) begin with the question, “How does a particular  policy, or law, or judgment, affect my GROUP(s)?”  For example, liberals group women together, and then assign them “women’s rights”.* One of their most important liberal women’s right is abortion, of which they interpret to mean that a woman has absolute control over her own body; rejecting any right of the baby or the father.
   Now, on to Dr Peggy McIntosh. Let’s apply the liberal “group all humans” philosophy to Black people, who are the context of point 15. The liberal reason for placing people in groups is, and I repeat,  to exert control over that group. As this relates to Black people, when Blacks are grouped together, the intent of the liberal mind is to cause all Blacks to speak/think/act alike! Said yet another way, to the liberal mind, Blacks are expected to think according to liberal expectations…or lose their Blackness, i.e.be labeled an Uncle Tom!!!
   Following is Dr McIntosh’s position: in her 15th point, she argues that WP allows Whites the great privilege of living without the heavy burden placed upon an individual White person to speak for all White people. Obviously, by default, this assumes the opposite for Black people. In other words, because of WP, any individual Black has the burden to speak for all Black people!!
  Incredibly…these very words unveil the very APEX of liberal hypocrisy! First, as wrote earlier, liberals group all Blacks together, which they use to coerce Blacks to think and act alike. Yet, according to Dr McIntosh’s number 15 example of WP, those same liberals who group all Blacks together, and demand that all Blacks adopt their liberal views, turn-around and accuse Whites of WP for expecting Blacks to think and speak alike!!
   You need proof? Following are the most recent examples of White liberals ‘grouping’ Blacks, expecting them to follow liberal thinking. Liberal Joe Biden said, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.” Or, what about Chelsea Handler, who is White, pompously declared about her former Black boyfriend Curtis Jackson(50 cent), “and I had to remind him (Curtis Jackson) that he was a black person, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump.” 
  These are perfect illustrations of two things:
            1.White liberals grouping Blacks expecting them to think
              according to THEIR enlightened philosophy!
2.Pure irrefutable liberal racism.

   Or, how about Dr McIntosh’s number  9.“I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods which fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser’s shop and find someone who can cut my hair.”
   Because my father was a Black barber, Dr McIntosh’s statement on hair-cutting caught my immediate attention. To save time, I will only comment on the hair-cutting part of her statement.
   First, my Black father cut White people’s hair for over 30 years…which means they chose him…is this an example of White or Black Privilege? Remember, it is Dr McIntosh who presumptuously claimed: to easily find someone of your skin color to cut your hair…’IS’ WP!!!! So…and I repeat, what do you call it when a White man chooses my father, a Black man, to cut his hair? The liberal idea of WP makes it very difficult to be consistent!
   Second, after my father passed, and I found other barbers to cut my hair, both Black and Hispanic barbers told me that in barber school they were taught to cut the hair of different ethnicities, both male and female! I have even had some Black barbers tell me they find it easier to cut White people’s hair than Blacks!
   While I have never asked a White barber his/her opinion on this issue**, there are two fundamental reasons a White barber would not have a problem cutting Black/Latino hair:
          1.Money. The White Barber who does not know how to cut Black
            hair leaves money on the table. Because hair-cutting is a
            business, that certainly would be unwise.
          2.License. All states require a license to cut hair. Therefore,
             because a license requires schooling, and barber schools teach
             their barbers to cut all kinds of hair, I can’t see how  a White
             barber would have any problems learning to cut Black hair! I
             saw Latino barbers cutting Black hair all the time!
 
   The essence of Dr McIntosh’s statement is racist…it assumes Black people ‘require’ Black barbers; and White people require White barbers; and Latino people require Latino barbers! In practice…it just ain’t so! This is yet another example of Liberal racism! In this case, White liberals telling Blacks who should cut their hair!! Humans should choose whomever they want to cut their hair, not have to conform to liberal clap-trap!!!
   I know Black women who have White hair-dressers, and even Latino hair-dressers! My wife has had both Black and White hairdressers, and presently has a Latino hairdresser…all by choice! However, according to Dr McIntosh, my wife ought to stay-in-her-lane!
  Our church has a Hispanic salon owner, with different races comprising their hair-dressers…all serving different ethnicities! I have a Black brother-in-law, who married a Latino woman, and their daughter is a hair-dresser---how does her mixed racial heritage fit into Dr McIntosh’s WP scenario?!?! I repeat, the definition of WP must be consistent…because it is irrational!
  In conclusion, WP advocates use their personal experiences to define WP---because it can have no objective standard!! In other words, a liberal can use anything a White person experiences—good or bad—and make it an example of WP! Therefore, WP is relative…and undefinable!
 
* FYI, all rights in our Constitution are individual--group rights do not exist!!
**Because it is so embarrassingly absurd!!!
 
QuoteBit
Don't borrow someone else's plan. Develop your own philosophy and it will lead you to unique places.
                                                          -Jim Rohn

   In order to understand this tidbit, please review Dr Joy DeGruy’s video, it’s only 3.48 seconds. To define WP, Dr DeGruy offers her experience at a grocery store with her young child, and her sister-in-law, who is bi-racial, but looks White. In short, the White check-out attendant allowed Dr DeGruy’s sister-in-law to easily pass through the check-out line because she looked White, but gave Dr DeGruy all kinds of trouble, by asking for several kinds of ID to verify her check, because she was Black--all the while not knowing Dr DeGruy’s sister-in-law, who passed through line before her, was Black! Dr DeGruy says not only did her daughter notice the different treatment, but so did other Whites behind her in the check-out line.
   This personal example reveals two inherent problems with WP.
1.Absolute Authoritarianism. If this situation were exactly reversed, would a Black check-out attendant be accused of Black Privilege? NO! Why? Because---according to liberalism, Blacks cannot have privilege! Why? Ironically…because of WP! Once WP is in place…no other privilege…especially Black privilege, can exist beside it!    
   Here is my point, as long as WP exists, even though the rich have privilege, the Black rich cannot have privilege! As long as WP exists, even though those with high IQ’s have privilege, Blacks with high IQ’s cannot have privilege! As long as WP exists, even though great musicians and singers would normally have privilege, Black great musicians and singers, cannot have privilege! As long as WP exists, even though Americans have privilege, Black Americans cannot have privilege!!! Why? The sovereignty of WP declares Blacks are oppressed, regardless of how rich, or what status in life they achieve; and Whites are oppressors, regardless of how poor, or little in life they experience!
   Oprah Winfrey offers the proof: “There are white people who are not as powerful as the system of white people – the caste system that's been put in place – but they still, no matter where they are on the rung, or the ladder of success, they still have their whiteness." "Whites have a leg up. You still have your whiteness. That's what the term 'white privilege' is. It means that whiteness still gives you an advantage, no matter. It is the fundamental issue." 
   In other words, Oprah, who is a billionaire, is still on a lower rung of the ladder than Appalachian Whites...who have a "leg-up"! Why? Oprah answers succinctly, "You still have your Whiteness!"
   WP trumps all! It allows 'NO' co-equal!!!! It takes 'NO' prisoners!!!
 
2.No Remedy. In theory, White Privilege is supposed to be evil. So, when we apply the “evil” connotation to Dr DeGruy’s experience, we would have to conclude that the White grocery check-out attendant behaved in a racist manner, right?!?! In other words, was the White check-out attendant wrong for treating Dr DeGruy differently, who is Black, from her sister-in-law who looks White? The only answer is a resounding YES!!! Of course!!! Absolutely!! But…if that White check-out attendant discriminated against Dr DeGruy, the attendant ought to apologize for her wrong behavior. In other words, if Person 1 offends Person 2, Person 1 ought to offer an apology to Person 2 to restore their relationship! Isn’t that right? Absolutely!
  I see two problems. First, some WP advocates say WP is not wrong! They argue, it’s just privilege, and lots of people have privilege!  For example, the rich have privilege; Americans have privilege; the intelligent have privilege—its’ all just privilege! So, because privilege exists, it can’t be wrong! Therefore, WP is not wrong, it just is!
   On the contrary however, WP advocates also have the leeway to take the exact opposite position*, declaring WP is wrong and should be acknowledged. They shout, “Acknowledge your WP!” intending to convey that WP is wrong. But if it is wrong and should be acknowledged, why is it that when a White person acknowledges his/her “White Privilege”…nothing happens!!! (See Tidbit 1).
   In other words, if Person 1 apologizes to Person 2 for a wrong done, then Person 2 ought to forgive that wrong done. Therefore, if the White check-out attendant apologizes to Dr DeGruy, her daughter, her sister-in-law, and the other witnesses for her bad behavior, she ought to be forgiven; and try to do better next time, isn’t that right?! YES!! Of Course!! Absolutely!
  Here is the problem. There is no remedy for WP! In other words, if the White check-out attendant apologized for her bad behavior, and Dr DeGruy forgave her, then the WP ought to be healed!! Right? YES!! Of Course!! Absolutely! However, if Dr DeGruy actually forgave the White grocery store check-out attendant’s bad behavior, their relationship would be restored, because forgiveness is designed to remove the pain of an offense, and restore broken relationships! But…if WP can be healed, it would no longer exist! The problem is that WP advocates cannot have a WP that can be healed! They need a WP that exists forever!!!  Why? Because it is ‘THE’ ingredient of victimology!!! In other words, if there is no victim of WP, there is no WP! Therefore, WP needs victimology, for without victimology, there is no basis for coercing the power and money they ultimately seek!!
  Lastly, because WP was created to have no remedy, it requires a driving component that has no remedy…and what is that? Whiteness!!!!! First, remember, WP requires Whiteness…which is why it is called WP!  Second, because a White person can never change his Whiteness, and WP requires a driving component that cannot change, Whiteness is the perfect choice. With ‘Whiteness’ as its unchanging component, WP is assured of continuing forever!!!
 
* Remember, WP is relative! Therefore, by rejecting the Law of Non-contradiction, WP can simultaneously exist as both A and non-A!
 
QuoteBit
Don't borrow someone else's plan. Develop your own philosophy and it will lead you to unique places.                                                    -Jim Rohn