For my final word on “Intersectionality”, allow me to offer two visuals. Let’s examine image 1.
The term “Intersectionality” originates from the philosophy that groups of people are oppressed in America. It is believed that as time passes, the list of oppressed groups in America grows. Here is their fundamental key: not only have the number of oppressed groups grown over time, but the number of oppressed individuals has also grown. Why? Because one can become a member of more than one oppressed group. Hence, the intersection in this image represents oppressed groups meeting at the ‘Intersection of Oppression’ in order to not only encourage one another’s oppression, but to possibly become a member of other oppressed groups. Remember, the more oppressed you are, and the more power (Moral Authority) you wield! In other words, the ultimate end of “Intersectionality” is not justice, but to maximize oppression!
The second point on image 1 is Moral Authority. The liberal idea of ‘Moral Authority’ is like ‘spinach to Pop-eye’; ‘long hair to Samson’; ‘the Sun to Superman’, i.e. 'Moral Authority’ gives liberals the power to act. In other words, liberals possess what I call a ‘Messianic Syndrome’, which means through their own enlightenment*, they literally believe their destiny is to lead the masses into ‘THE’ (their) promised land. Therefore, they invented, then made, victimology their Moral Authority, allowing them to present a mask of their higher or greater enlightenment i.e. “righteousness”, to the world! Victimology allows them to determine who is righteous and unrighteous in order to shut-down, shut-out, and ultimately crush all infidels…i.e. Cancel Culture!
Now on to image 2.
First, the following ideology drives this list:
i.America was born an oppressive nation, therefore…
ii.America is a nation of oppressors and the oppressed.
iii.Oppression began with Whites oppressing Indians, Blacks, and women.
iv.America’s oppression continues by adding more groups to the list, as times passes.
v.No one is allowed to leave the oppression. Once an oppressor or the oppressed, there is no deliverance. In other words, there is no escape.
Second, the order of victims on image 2 reveals how “Intersectionality” works. The closer you get to the top the more oppressed you are; while, the lower on the list, the more oppressive you are. However, there is a devastating nuance to this warped philosophy! For example, according to ‘Intersectionality’, Blacks are second only to LGBTQ in victimology. However, if a Black person becomes a Christian, he doesn’t just drop down a couple of notches on the list—he free falls to the bottom, becoming an oppressor!!!
One fairly good example is U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Clarence presently possesses the incredible honor of being the second Black Supreme Court Justice in American history. He grew-up in abject poverty in the deep south, in a single parent home. He experienced White racism, which ultimately drove him into the Black power movement of the 1960’s, hating all things White. However, God used his grandparents to help him, and was ultimately delivered from the liberalism and hatred that bound him.
In the liberal mind, this is completely unacceptable. Clarence Thomas committed blasphemy by rejecting their victimology; and as far as I am aware, he yet has no memorial in The National Museum of African American History and Culture’ (NMAAHC) in Washington D.C.!**
How can a Blackman with such momentous achievements not be honored by Black America? I repeat, by rejecting liberalism’s Moral Authority: victimology!!!
In conclusion, I’m sure you’ve noticed that the bottom of the list contains ‘White men’ and ‘Biblical Christianity’. This is no accident for it irrefutably describes the real agenda of “Intersectionality”:
2.To stoke racism in the nation, in order to divide and conquer
1.To destroy the Judaeo-Christian ethic, and replace it with
Socialism/Communism or Fascism
As usual, the Bible has the answer:
“The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences
have been seared as with a hot iron.” -1Tim4:1,2 (NIV)
*This is better known as self-enlightenment
**This could have changed, but the fact that he was not immediately given a place of the highest honor in this museum is irrefutable evidence of liberal racism!!!
The shelf-life of your formal education, with any and all of your degrees, is about eighteen months.
– Denis Waitley
‘Word Manipulation’ is the number one tactic of liberal deception. What exactly is it? ‘Word Manipulation’ comprises two areas: 1.creating new words 2.redefining old words. Liberals use the tactic of ‘Word Manipulation’ to drive public opinion, coerce political philosophy, to make laws, and finally, to cancel and ultimately destroy their opposition.
Today let’s examine the word: intersectionality, which falls under the category of: 1.creating new words.
In 1989, Dr Kimberle Crenshaw created the term “Intersectionality”. She declares: “Intersectionality …was my attempt to make feminism, anti-racism activism, and anti-discrimination law do what I thought they should—highlight the multiple avenues through which racial and gender oppression were experienced.”
-Dr. Kimberle Crenshaw, Law Professor, Columbia University
“the theory that the overlap of various social identities, as race, gender, sexuality, and class, contributes to the type of systemic oppression and discrimination experienced by an individual.”
“Race, religion, nationality, sexuality, gender, class, age. In these intersections we see different types of systemic oppression (privilege), that a person may experience. In other words, the obstacles faced by an older black woman, are much different from those faced by a younger white man. In other words, these two people will view the world, and be viewed by the world differently because of their various social identities. Recognizing these different experiences can help fuel conversations and build empathy between people with different backgrounds.”
If we compare both Dr Crenshaw’s and Dictionary.com’s definitions, we notice a small, but significant difference. While Dr Crenshaw’s view highlights more of the race and gender distinctive; whereas dictionary.com focuses more on a general application to all people. At first glance, with special emphasis on Dictionary.com, my initial thoughts are that ‘Intersectionality’ is innocuous. However, what determines the “good or evil” in this situation is not its philosophy, but its practicality, or how this word looks when applied in everyday American life.
In application, I see many things wrong with ‘Intersectionality’. First, its focus on oppression. The underlying assumption of ‘Intersectionality’ is oppression—but not all people, only ‘certain’ people are oppressed. Dr Crenshaw declares ‘Intersectionality’ “highlights the multiple avenues through which racial and gender oppression were experienced.” And, Dictionary.com highlights how ‘Intersectionality’ “contributes to the type of systemic oppression and discrimination experienced by an individual.” In other words, the entire focus of ‘Intersectionality’ is: that ‘certain’ Americans are oppressed, persecuted, disrespected, or privileged; where even Dictionary.com defines ‘privileged’ as oppression. I repeat, in the mind of Dictionary.com privilege=oppression. Said still another way, they believe if you are privileged--you are THE oppressor! The question is who are the oppressors?
First, whereas liberalism calls privilege oppression, the Word of God declares, righteousness brings favor(Ps5:12)—where ‘favor’ and ‘privilege’ are synonymous! I repeat, God bestows favor on the righteous!!! Therefore, privilege is NOT oppression!!! Favor(privilege) is a reward or a blessing from God for those who walk uprightly(Ps84:11).
Second, who are the oppressors? And, who are the oppressed? To whom do you think Dr Crenshaw refers when she writes of ‘Intersectionality’: “highlight the multiple avenues through which racial and gender oppression were experienced?” Considering that liberals declare Blacks can’t be racist, and the Whiteness of White people means they have privilege, can only mean that Whites are the oppressors, and Blacks are their oppressed!
Third, so what is the core problem with ‘Intersectionality’? It encourages a person to examine his/her personal life to determine how other people are oppressing him/her on multiple levels. For example, one is mandated to personally ask: How am I oppressed because I am Black? How am I oppressed because I am a lesbian? How am I oppressed because I am a woman? How am I oppressed because I am a transgender? In short, how am I oppressed by anybody and
In practical application, this works-out to mean liberalism encourages Black people to search their hearts to determine ‘how often’, and ‘to what degree’, White people oppress Blacks!! But remember, in spite of Dictionary.com’s definition, this is not a general application, for there is no such thing as Blacks oppressing Whites; or Hispanics oppressing Blacks; or Blacks oppressing Hispanics!! In ‘Intersectionality’, Whites are the oppressors, and everyone else are the victims of White oppression!
On the contrary, the Bible encourages us to focus on our victory: “But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ”(1Cor15:57)! To focus on our triumph: “Now thanks be unto God, which always causes us to triumph in Christ(2Cor2:14)! To focus on the good report (Phil4:8); to focus on the capability to do all things through Christ(Mk9:23), etc.
Therefore, whose report will you believe? Intersectionality or the Bible?
Furthermore, as ‘Intersectionality’ encourages people to focus on what others have done to them, i.e.victimology, or what Whites have done to Blacks, it rejects focusing on one’s personal sin, or what YOU have done to others. Once again, the Bible encourages: “Search ME, O God,
and know my heart: try ME, and know my thoughts: and see if there be any wicked way in ME…”(Ps139:23,24). When David committed adultery with Bathsheba, he prayed, “Against YOU (God) and YOU (God) only have I sinned, and done this evil in YOUR (God) sight…”(Ps51:4).
Notice, David’s focus on himself in Psalms 139:23,24! And then in Psalms 51:4, he focuses on how he offended God—not on how Bathsheba offended him! What is extremely interesting here
is that in Psalms 51:4, David says nothing about Bathsheba, although she was also guilty---David initially saw her bathing on her rooftop! Do women normally bath outside; and on a rooftop too?!?! In other words, David did not blame his problems on others! He was not a victim! This is
why God said David had a heart after His own(1Sam13:14)
It is absolutely certain, if you search long enough for something others have done to you— YOU WILL FIND IT—even if it doesn’t exist!
*However, notice that this does not apply to White people—because according to liberalism’s ‘Intersectionality’…Whites are THE oppressors!
Define your future by your dreams, and not by your memories; by your hopes, and not by your fears.
-JOE TYE, Motivational speaker and leadership coach
“But wisdom is justified by her children” -Matt11:19(NKJV) This means wisdom is known by what it produces.
White Privilege is an unnatural focus on the color of Whiteness; and by default, an unnatural focus on Blackness (as well as any other skin color). Because skin color is one of the least important aspects of a human being, to concentrate on it creates racism; and as contemporary liberalism has proven, ultimately contributes to legislating racism. Allow me to offer more evidence for this real-life fact.
1.For many decades, African witchdoctors in several countries have been known for murdering albinos and using body parts for rituals, because of their skin color. Now Albinism (people without the chemical melanin), which is called ‘whiteness’ is being blamed for the coronavirus.
Dr. Charlotte Baker, Director of the UK-based Albinism in Africa Network, reports, "It is the perceived whiteness of people with albinism. It is being interpreted that they are carriers of what is seen as a white man's disease. It comes from China where people have fair skin in the African mindset and so they are seen as carriers of this disease. It's another dimension of the stigma attached to albinism."
2.Hindu gods. Inspired by Black Lives Matter advocate Shaun King who declared all the murals and stained glass of a white Jesus, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, announced he would review the statues of Jesus in Britain; who in turn inspired Indian economist Rupa Subramanya to declare, “"We must also ask why Hindu deities are so light skinned. Very few Indians in real life are actually that fair...” In response Indians attacked Ms Subramanya declaring “Hindu gods are black, blue, yellow, red, white, and pink”. One twitter user responded, “Goddess Kali, Krishna, Shiva, Ram and so many other gods are never light skinned! In fact, in southern India so many goddesses like Mariyamma, Chamundeshwari etc. are never light-skinned.”
Subramanya later responded that she was not an expert in Hinduism. Embarrassing herself by attempting to take her place in “Woke” crowd, Ms Subramanya is the exact consequence of people who place an inordinate focus on the color of Whiteness—or any skin color…for that matter!
3.African-American Rhoda Mhiripiri-Reed, who is Hopkins Public Schools Superintendent, is demanding teachers “examine their whiteness and the role it plays in perpetuating racism”. Mhiripiri-Reed continues, “we need to examine the role that whiteness plays in our macro-system of white supremacy,” and it’s not the “responsibility of people of color to fix racism, or to explain to white people how not to be racist.”
If you pay close attention to how Mhiripiri-Reed uses the word “racism” in her comments, you will notice that by “racism” she means “White racism”. In other words, liberals have used Word Manipulation to change the definition of “racism” to “White racism”. This is done for three reasons: 1.to make all racism equal to White racism; 2.to make all Whites racists; 3.to prohibit Blacks from being racists.
Of course, this is not only racist, but blasphemy. Why? Because it removes racism from the category of sin, and re-categorizes it under “Whiteness”. On the contrary, only God can define sin!
4.“The Seattle Public Schools Ethnic Studies Advisory Committee (ESAC) released a rough draft of notes for its Math Ethnic Studies framework in late September, which attempts to connect math to a history of oppression.” “It is also stated in the document that Western mathematics is “used to disenfranchise people and communities of color.””
Of course, one cannot leave-out the role of America in all this, for the document continues, “math is oppressive, and the US government racist.” On the contrary, only liberal logic can declare math racist, and in the same breath, encourage a leap from the racism of math to the racism of America!!
Moreover, the liberal Seattle school system is simply a continuation of the tradition of connecting math and racism. For example, years prior to the Ethnomathmatics of the ESAC, “A University of Illinois math professor, Rochelle Gutierrez believes that algebra and geometry perpetuate “white privilege” because Greek terms give Caucasians unearned credit for the subject.” Dr Gutierrez continues, “On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness, who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community who is generally viewed as White.”
Refusing to be left out of the “wokeism”, the liberal state of Oregon now promotes “Dismantling Racism in Math Instruction.” “In a February 2021 bulletin sent out by the Oregon Department of Education, just below a feature on Black History Month, is a notice announcing a “micro-course” for educators titled: “A Pathway to Math Equity.” The course promises to provide educators with “key tools for engagement [and] strategies to improve equitable outcomes for Black, Latinx, and multilingual students” and knowledge on how to “dismantle racism in mathematics instruction.”
“We see white supremacy culture show up in the mathematics classroom even as we carry out our professional responsibilities” explains the guide. Educators must therefore take on the responsibility for “visibilizing the toxic characteristics of white supremacy culture with respect to math.” So, according to Seattle and Oregon, math is now racist!!
5.Seattle is not finished: “Spirit Murder”. “Investigative reporter Christopher Rufo reported that the Seattle public schools were giving a training program to teachers that instructed them to “bankrupt their white privilege” as well as “commit to the journey” of anti-whiteness while discussing “spirit murder,” which is the idea that Americans schools “murder the souls of Black children every day through systemic, institutionalized, anti-Black, state-sanctioned violence. The trainers begin by claiming that teachers are colonizers of Native American ‘ancestral lands”’ and that ‘the United States was built off the stolen labor of kidnapped and enslaved Black people’s work, which created the profits that created our nation.’”
If White American teachers murder the spirits of Black children EVERYDAY in public schools, I wonder when and how this so-called “Spirit Murder” started? Black Economist and historian, Thomas Sowell, writes in ‘Black Rednecks and White Liberals’(pgs 35-36), “In 1866, over 1400 Northern White teachers, most young and single, from dozens of missionary associations in New England left their comfortable homes to teach Black children in 975 Southern schools. Most of the schools were one-room shanty’s in rural areas where most Blacks lived.” This was extremely dangerous because it was against the law to educate Black people, and some teachers were murdered!!! However, in spite of the risk, the next year, in 1867, an additional 1100 young missionary teachers went south. By 1870, there were over 2500 northern teachers educating Blacks in over 2000 schools. On this movement, W.E.B. Du Bois, the first Black to earn a Ph.D. from Harvard declared, “to plant the New England college in the South was the salvation of the South and the Negro” (‘Black Rednecks and White Liberals’, pg38).
These White teachers: 1.risked their literal lives; 2.sacrificed their own careers; 3.Were paid little to nothing…to commit “Spirit Murder” on Black people?!?!?!?! Really?!!? And what’s more, since 1866, tens of millions of Black kids have been educated by White people all over America--and I am one of them!!! “Black Spirit Murder” is yet another liberal racist myth!
These 5 examples are just a few more consequences of the liberal doctrine of White Privilege, i.e.Whiteness…which is nothing more than ‘Liberal Racism’ by another name!
If you are not willing to become a fool, you cannot become a master” - Jordan Peterson